Topic / Subject / Text | ||
CENTRAL IDEAS Content: In the struggle for civil rights for African Americans, MLK advocated a nonviolent response to unjust laws. Nonviolence is a strategy that involves far more than the absence of violence; it involves a choice on the part of the individual to confront unjust authority directly, and often provocatively, and may expose the individual to risk of arrest, incarceration, or injury. MLK’s invocation of nonviolent resistance was part of a rich tradition with roots in Christianity and the teachings of Gandhi. Reading: teacher selected editorials, photographs, Public Statement by Eight Birmingham Clergymen (1963); MLK’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” (1963) Writing: After several short writing assignments, students will write a contemporaneous newspaper editorial in which they report on MLK’s incarceration, describe nonviolent resistance and other options available to MLK , and take a position as to what Birmingham’s clergy and elected officials ought to do about the laws and practices MLK challenged as unjust |
Focusing Question | Focus (answer to focusing question) | ||
What options do you as an individual citizen have in the face of state action that you believe to be unjust? | The individual citizen can acquiesce, and most people do. The majority of Birmingham’s clergy urged MLK to do the same. The individual might instead attempt to influence others to act, or might him/herself act, directly and violently, or directly and nonviolently. MLK chose nonviolent direct action. |
| |||||||
• vocabulary • guided reading • text mapping • paraphrasing • summarizing • visualizing/ • imaging • dramatizing • oral processing / guided conversation / think-pair- share • experience • debating • taking notes (graphic organizers, T-charts, 2 column notes, etc.) • craft lessons (intro, transitions, conclusions, etc) | Context: the struggle for civil rights for African Americans in the 20th century, to be taught through 1) guided class discussion and note taking 2) video (“Eye on the Prize,” or PBS ) and class notes Vocabulary review: terms such as ‘civil rights’, ‘direct action,’ segregation, negotiation, and potentially new vocabulary: clarion, gospel, lamentably, cognizant, etc. Visualizing: students will examine photographs of Martin Luther King (mug shot and incarcerated) and do a Quick Write Guided reading: each student reads aloud and paraphrases a paragraph (redo letter from B. Jail with columns for questions, paraphrasing, student check in) Summarizing: students will select 5 paragraphs, and using only those sections, draft a Wikipedia entry for the Letter. Model/Graphic organizing: Students read 3-4 editorials from different sources selected by teacher, and graphic organizer provided with which students identify and describe FOCUS, STRUCTURE, DETAIL and VOICE, followed by Class discussion Oral Processing/think-pair-share: in small groups students will share their Wikipedia entries and as a class we will review the real Wikipedia entry on Letter from a Birmingham Jail and compare work Writing: Students will write and share hook sentences. Students will draft editorials. Peer Editing: Students will share their articles with Peer Editor(s) and with teacher, after which they will REVISE and work toward FINAL DRAFT |
How will students know how to organize their ideas and construct the piece of writing? | |||
• graphic organizers • teacher-written models • teacher-and-student written models • various types of templates or frames (ex: Painted Essay) | Teacher model based on ‘Painted Essay’ (By the end of the course, when this lesson will be presented, students will hopefully be thinking in terms of painted essay) Editorials from NYT, several local papers Wikipedia entry |
How will students draft / revise so that their final writing is clearly focused, organized, and developed to show understanding of the central ideas? | |||
• group write, fully or in part • write section at a time • write full piece independently • revise /share full group • revise /share partners • proofreading in partners • proofread w/tubaloos | - after Wikipedia entry write, students will: - independently write an editorial - proofread with partner review teacher comments -revise/share with small group |
Lesson Sequence What steps will I follow so that students are able to effectively show their understanding in writing? |
See section above for steps and sequence. |
|
Ask students to consider an injustice they confront in their own lives, and to articulate their range of choices. If interest and time permits, we might write letters to leaders/editors about topics of general concern. |
Hi Kelly, sorry to take so long to comment onyour wondeful unit. It is so very throough in scaffolding understanding for kids--I know the MLK Letter is a tough one for many students, and your approach will really develop understanding in a meaningful way. I think your plan creates a cultural and historical context that will really serve your kids well as their political sophistication and knowledge develops, after the course is long over.
ReplyDeleteI also like the emphasis of the focusing question on students' own options as citizens (why else did we go into teaching, right?). Using Eyes on the Prize is a great way to marshal the emotional engagement that will help kids care about the subject--no one could watch those firehoses trained on children and remain detached, and I really believe the emotional engagement is crucial for real understanding (and good writing too). I thnk the shorter pieces prior to the editorial are a good idea for "rehearsing" thinking in writing.
Re writing groups: The term "peer editing" always bothers me a bit, as I want kids to think in terms of revision, not editing, which really is so much more limited. I use the terminology of "writing groups" to comprehend that larger sense of all the group can do. (I also like to have kids write a pre-group note asking for feedback in specific areas, and a post-group note to me telling me their plans for revision. It's nice to be able to respond to things the kids have already identified on their own--sort of empowers them a bit.) I also really like your plan for paraphrasing, which I think is a way undervalued means to check, and deepen, comprehension of challenging text, and I like your approach of having kids take full responsibility for a limited stretch of text, to encourage them to really examine the language closely in a way they wouldn't do when trying to totally master the entire letter.
I think by the time your kids write the editorial, they will really, really know what they're talking about and will have developed reasoned, personally engaged responses--bingo!
Thanks for a great lesson--I plan to borrow liberally! Your students are in luck to have such thoughtful, meaningful teaching ahead of them.
Nancy D.