About VWC

The Vermont Writing Collaborative is a group of teachers in Vermont (and elsewhere!) whose mission is to help all students, K - 12, write thoughtfully and effectively.
The five founding members are: Jane Miller of Burlington, Karen Kurzman of Derby Line, Eloise Ginty of Thetford, Joey Hawkins of Strafford, and Diana Leddy of Strafford. Among us, we have over 130 years of public school teaching experience at all grade levels.
In the fall of 2008, we published a book through Authentic Education (with a foreword by Grant Wiggins) called Writing for Understanding:Using Backward Design to Help All Students Write Effectively.
Since then, we have offered courses and workshops in the principles of Writing for Understanding around Vermont, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and elsewhere.

Welcome, VWC members!

June, 2011 - what a grand Summer Institute! We held four different strands, and had the honor of working with both old friends and new ones. It was a joy!
Teachers are working on a whole new batch of Writing for Understanding sequences, and those will begin appearing here. If you're a course participant, thanks for posting and giving your thoughtful feedback.
If you're a VWC follower, your feedback is most welcome as well!


Sunday, August 2, 2009

Writing for Understanding Instruction
 Teacher Plan
 
Teacher_Kelly Welsh Ellis__Class:  20th C World History – High School juniors and seniors
 Date: 06/30/09  Writing genre:  Persuasive essay
 
 
 

Topic /  Subject / Text

 

 

CENTRAL IDEAS

 

 

Content: In the struggle for civil rights for African Americans, MLK advocated a nonviolent response to unjust laws.  Nonviolence is a strategy that involves far more than the absence of violence;  it involves a choice on the part of the individual to confront unjust authority directly, and often provocatively, and may expose the individual to risk of arrest, incarceration, or injury.  MLK’s invocation of nonviolent resistance was part of a rich tradition with roots in Christianity and the teachings of Gandhi.

 

Reading: teacher selected editorials, photographs, Public Statement by Eight Birmingham Clergymen (1963); MLK’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” (1963)

 

Writing: After several short writing assignments, students will write a contemporaneous newspaper editorial in which they report on MLK’s incarceration, describe nonviolent resistance and other options available to MLK  , and take a position as to what Birmingham’s clergy and elected officials ought to do about the laws and practices MLK challenged as unjust

 
 

 
      

          Focusing Question

 

 

Focus (answer to focusing question)

 

What options do you as an individual citizen have in the face of state action that you believe to be unjust? 

 

 

 

 

 

 The individual citizen can acquiesce, and most people do.  The majority of Birmingham’s clergy urged MLK to do the same. The individual might instead attempt to influence others to act, or might him/herself act, directly and violently, or directly and nonviolently. MLK chose nonviolent direct action.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
              Building Content Knowledge, Understanding of Writer’s Craft

 
 


   

 

 

  vocabulary

  • guided reading

  • text mapping

  • paraphrasing

  • summarizing

  • visualizing/

  • imaging

  • dramatizing

  • oral processing / guided

  conversation / think-pair-

   share

  • experience

  • debating

  • taking notes (graphic

  organizers, T-charts, 2 column

   notes, etc.)

  • craft lessons (intro, transitions, conclusions, etc)

Context:  the struggle for civil rights for African Americans in the 20th century, to be taught through

1) guided class discussion and note taking  

2) video (“Eye on the Prize,” or PBS ) and class notes

 

Vocabulary review: terms such as ‘civil rights’, ‘direct action,’  segregation, negotiation, and potentially new vocabulary:  clarion, gospel, lamentably, cognizant, etc.

 

Visualizing:  students will examine photographs of Martin Luther King (mug shot and incarcerated) and do a Quick Write

 

Guided reading:  each student reads aloud and paraphrases a paragraph (redo letter from B. Jail with columns for questions, paraphrasing, student check in)

 

Summarizing:  students will select 5 paragraphs, and using only those sections, draft a Wikipedia entry for the Letter. 

 

Model/Graphic organizing:  Students read 3-4 editorials from different sources selected by teacher, and graphic organizer provided with which students identify and describe FOCUS, STRUCTURE, DETAIL and VOICE, followed by Class discussion

 

Oral Processing/think-pair-share: in small groups students will share their Wikipedia entries and as a class we will review the real Wikipedia entry on Letter from a Birmingham Jail and compare work

 

Writing:  Students will write and share hook sentences.

 

Students will draft editorials.

 

Peer Editing:  Students will share their articles with Peer Editor(s) and with teacher, after which they will REVISE and work toward FINAL DRAFT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
                                           Structures

                                        How will students know how to organize their ideas

                                                   and construct the piece of writing?

 

 • graphic organizers

• teacher-written models

 • teacher-and-student

   written models

 • various types of templates

  or frames

(ex: Painted Essay)

 

 

Teacher model based on ‘Painted Essay’

(By the end of the course, when this lesson will be presented, students will hopefully be thinking in terms of painted essay)

Editorials from NYT, several local papers

Wikipedia entry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
             Writing  / Revising

                     How will students draft / revise so that their final writing is clearly focused,

                     organized, and developed to show understanding of the central ideas?

 

 

  group write, fully or in

     part

 • write section at a time

 • write full piece

   independently

 • revise /share full group

 • revise /share partners

 • proofreading in partners

 • proofread w/tubaloos

 

- after Wikipedia entry write, students will:

 

- independently write an editorial

 

- proofread with partner

 

review teacher comments

 

-revise/share with small group

 
 
 

   Lesson Sequence

What steps will I follow so that students are able to  effectively

show their understanding in writing?

  See section above for steps and sequence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

   Assessment: How are students doing? What are my next steps as a teacher?

 Ask students to consider an injustice they confront in their own lives, and to articulate their range of choices.  If interest and time permits, we might write letters to leaders/editors about topics of general concern.

 

 

 

 

 

1 comment:

  1. Hi Kelly, sorry to take so long to comment onyour wondeful unit. It is so very throough in scaffolding understanding for kids--I know the MLK Letter is a tough one for many students, and your approach will really develop understanding in a meaningful way. I think your plan creates a cultural and historical context that will really serve your kids well as their political sophistication and knowledge develops, after the course is long over.

    I also like the emphasis of the focusing question on students' own options as citizens (why else did we go into teaching, right?). Using Eyes on the Prize is a great way to marshal the emotional engagement that will help kids care about the subject--no one could watch those firehoses trained on children and remain detached, and I really believe the emotional engagement is crucial for real understanding (and good writing too). I thnk the shorter pieces prior to the editorial are a good idea for "rehearsing" thinking in writing.

    Re writing groups: The term "peer editing" always bothers me a bit, as I want kids to think in terms of revision, not editing, which really is so much more limited. I use the terminology of "writing groups" to comprehend that larger sense of all the group can do. (I also like to have kids write a pre-group note asking for feedback in specific areas, and a post-group note to me telling me their plans for revision. It's nice to be able to respond to things the kids have already identified on their own--sort of empowers them a bit.) I also really like your plan for paraphrasing, which I think is a way undervalued means to check, and deepen, comprehension of challenging text, and I like your approach of having kids take full responsibility for a limited stretch of text, to encourage them to really examine the language closely in a way they wouldn't do when trying to totally master the entire letter.

    I think by the time your kids write the editorial, they will really, really know what they're talking about and will have developed reasoned, personally engaged responses--bingo!

    Thanks for a great lesson--I plan to borrow liberally! Your students are in luck to have such thoughtful, meaningful teaching ahead of them.

    Nancy D.

    ReplyDelete