About VWC

The Vermont Writing Collaborative is a group of teachers in Vermont (and elsewhere!) whose mission is to help all students, K - 12, write thoughtfully and effectively.
The five founding members are: Jane Miller of Burlington, Karen Kurzman of Derby Line, Eloise Ginty of Thetford, Joey Hawkins of Strafford, and Diana Leddy of Strafford. Among us, we have over 130 years of public school teaching experience at all grade levels.
In the fall of 2008, we published a book through Authentic Education (with a foreword by Grant Wiggins) called Writing for Understanding:Using Backward Design to Help All Students Write Effectively.
Since then, we have offered courses and workshops in the principles of Writing for Understanding around Vermont, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and elsewhere.

Welcome, VWC members!

June, 2011 - what a grand Summer Institute! We held four different strands, and had the honor of working with both old friends and new ones. It was a joy!
Teachers are working on a whole new batch of Writing for Understanding sequences, and those will begin appearing here. If you're a course participant, thanks for posting and giving your thoughtful feedback.
If you're a VWC follower, your feedback is most welcome as well!


Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Intervention Lesson Sequence
Kristin Armstrong

Purpose: Increase students’ ability to elaborate in their written reports of science experiments and responses to prompts.
Student work shows writing limited in:
• detailed explanations
• sensory language
• sequentially arranged and complete recounts of actions
• content vocabulary
• sentence structures to relay cause/effect and time relationships.
The goal of this intervention is to establish vocabulary resources and writing patterns upon which to gradually expand throughout the year, leading to more in-depth and descriptive writing over time.

NH State Standards Addressed:
W:IW:8:3 In informational writing, students demonstrate use of a range of elaboration strategies by …
8:3.1 Including facts and details relevant to focus/controlling idea, and excluding extraneous information.
8:3.2 Including sufficient details or facts for appropriate depth of information: naming, describing, explaining, comparing, use of visual images.
S:SPS3:8:2.4 Synthesize observations and findings into coherent explanations about natural resources and the environment.
S:SPS4:8:4.2 Use evidence collected from observations or other sources and use them to create models and explanations.
S:SPS4:8:2.1 Use a wide range of tools and a variety of oral, written, and graphic formats to share information and results from observations and investigations.

Population: Grade 8, Earth/Physical Science Class for ELL and Special Needs Learners. 12 students total, all receiving special services and achieving substantially below proficient or partially proficient on NECAPs.

Schedule: 20 minute blocks (1/2 of science periods), 5-8 days in a row for targeted intervention.

Assessment: preliminary assessment on final day, on-going assessment using same rubric throughout the year.

Scaffolding Techniques:
Teacher models
Think-alouds
Heterogeneous pairings of students
Group writing
Graphic Organizers
Writing Frames
Realia
Manipulatives/hands-on sentence work
Public Notes

Lesson Sequence:
1. Group brainstorm on question: What is the job of a scientist? How do they do this? Elicit answer: to observe and help others understand the world by using their senses and carefully organizing their thoughts/observations.
2. Public Notes: 5 senses. Label large chart paper around room with a sense.
3. Jig-saw: in groups of 2-3 (5 groups total), students are assigned a sense about which to become experts. Students as expert groups examine realia in a carousel formation, filling in their sense on the “Language of Scientists” graphic organizer. Re-organize into groups made of an expert from each sense, and have experts tell others about their sense for each object and fill-in graphic organizers. These will be kept in student “Toolboxes” for future reference. Back in expert groups, transfer prioritized word lists onto public notes around room using student scribes.
4. Teacher Model of hypothesis and data gathering while co-teacher does experiment. Use projector to model completing Hypothesis/Observation graphic organizer. As large group, students complete Experiment Flow Chart graphic organizer. Students use Writing a Lab Report frame, and complete with a partner.
5. In groups of 3, students categorize sensory vocabulary written on note cards (cover public notes). Give prompt: The liquid was __________________. Students choose appropriate words from their stack and arrange into a sentence describing the liquid.
6. Observation Practice: watch a Rube Goldburg video. Students record as many actions and adverbs as they can. Compile into another piece of chart paper labeled “Actions/How they are done”.
7. Give students a scrambled sentence by distributing note cards containing single words. Students must arrange themselves into a sensible sensory sentence. Ex. The liquid looked dark brown and smelled sweet, moving slowly and thickly down the side of the test-tube.
8. Student experiment in partners/small groups. Students complete the Observations and Flow Chart in pairings, then complete frame individually. Assess using rubric.


Next Steps in Gradual Release:
• Individual note-taking and sentence generation for experiments.
• Lessen/remove sentence starters from frame for Lab Report.
• Continue adding to and referencing public notes.
• Continue to use the same rubric to assess details and elaboration in writing throughout the year.

1 comment:

  1. Kristen,

    This science report intervention lesson regarding elaboration looks good. As a 5th grade teacher, I'm also struggling to find ways to help students elaborate, not only in their science reports or observation reflections, but in their narrative, response to text, and report writings. I know that this is meant for your 8th grade students, but it looks like it is quite transferable across grade levels. I like the lesson sequence starting off with a brainstorm about the job of a scientist. This is such an important and universal concept that I think can be missed by some students. I think that teachers may make assumptions that all students know what a scientist's job is, but in fact, this may not really be the case. I like that students get to talk and share their ideas, it will really generate some good discussions as well as give an equal opportunity for all kids to share their ideas. The concepts of using the 5 senses to help students with elaboration is also key. I like the fact that students will become experts in a particular sense. I understand that you will also have public notes showing details about all the senses, but how will you make sure that each student is comfortable with the senses that they are not experts on, so that they can effectively use the ideas to elaborate? The Rube Goldburgh Video sounds interesting. This is a neat way for students to observe actions and then record what they see. Will you use some of their words they come up with from the video for the sentence activity or will these notecards be pre-made by you? I like the teacher model idea for the hypothesis lesson? Will there be an opportunity for the students in future lessons to practice hypothesizing themselves? I love all the collaboration that this lesson sequence has. I think the students will really feel like they own this learning instruction. It is a wonderful way to get students motivated and to become responsible for their own learning! Way to go. I can't wait to hear how it turns out!

    ReplyDelete